On 31/05/13 21:35, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 31/05/13 21:03, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> And it is now in the [testing] repository. >>>> >>>> A reminder of the upgrade instructions: >>>> >>>> >>>> 1) Fix any non-official packages with files in /bin, /sbin or /usr/sbin >>>> to put those files in /usr/bin. The list of packages to be fixed can be >>>> generated using: >>>> $ comm -12 <(pacman -Qqm) <(pacman -Qqo /bin /sbin /usr/sbin | sort -u) >>>> >>> A sort is needed for the first pacman call. >>> >>> $ comm -12 <(pacman -Qqm) <(pacman -Qqo /bin /sbin /usr/sbin | sort >>> -u) >>> ... >>> comm: file 1 is not in sorted order >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> >> >> >> Hrm... I was sure pacman sorted this occording to the system locale. >> Will add for the news post. >> >> Allan >> > Another small suggestion about the message, it doesn't detect packages > in unofficial repositories. > I had some packages conflicting and not detected because they are in > my personal repostory. > I used the following command to detect all packages (except filesystem). > > comm -12 <(pacman -Qq|grep -v filesystem|sort) <(pacman -Qqo /bin > /sbin /usr/sbin|sort)
And then had to go through the list and check what was in the repos... I'll add a note to check unofficial repo packages. > Why not symlink /usr/local/sbin to /usr/local/bin in filesystems? > Because there is absolutely no upgrade path for that.
