On 03/07/13 07:56, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > On 2013/7/2 Rashif Ray Rahman <[email protected]> wrote: >> An official announcement is useful here because it requires user >> intervention. An install message is not appropriate (i.e. not >> sufficient for the problem at hand). >> >> So, yes, if there is no other way to solve this you should post a news >> announcement explaining the reason why this intervention is required >> and the steps to take in order to solve it. > > I think we can try that. I will upload the current version of packages > to [testing]. I don't think it is a common practice to sliently > overwrite files in /etc, but I don't understand why new files get > installed as .pacnew. > > I have tried the upgrade path from a clean Texlive 2012 install and it > does not replace the old files. >
Hi Remy, Can you send me a pacman --debug log for the upgrade from a fresh Texlive 2012 install that shows the .pacnew being created? Thanks, Allan
