On 28/11/2013 07:22, Daniel Isenmann wrote: > Am 28.11.2013 02:15, schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: >> On 27/11/2013 15:31, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: >>> On 27/11/2013 14:57, Alexander Rødseth wrote: >>>> A bit sad to be starting out the new docker package with "the mark of >>>> shame" (epoch=1), but so be it. ;) > > That was the reason for the discussion about the way we should rename it > and the epoch=1 solution which Alexander mentioned. ;-) > I made tests with a local repository with a docker-tray[1] package and a docker package with epoch set to 1. It replaces docker version<=1.5 and it conflicts with docker (because of /usr/bin/docker). No need to provides, there is no reverse dep on docker[2] and it will create issue in the future. It works well.
Daniel, could you handle the renaming and replacing of docker by docker-tray[1] in extra (I cannot do it)? That let me push new docker as soon as it's ready. Cheers, [1] https://horus.seblu.net/~seblu/docker-tray/PKGBUILD [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/docker/ -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
