On 27/03/14 08:24 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Am 27.03.2014 09:52, schrieb Connor Behan: >> On 27/03/14 01:07 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>> Am 26.03.2014 20:08, schrieb Dave Reisner: >>>> Looks like audit is still built into our kernel. Wasn't this meant to be >>>> reverted as well? >>> Forgot about that. That was pulled in by AppArmor or so. >> Wasn't it pulled in by http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/12584 and the fact >> that community/audit came out shortly after? > No, it was pulled in accidentally as a dependency of AppArmor. I doubt that. AppArmor was enabled a year and a half after audit was.
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/kernel26&id=e46bc1d41848b258a138df26590967dc1e0a3417 https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/kernel26&id=688e0f7508fa943868470e9d6c0dcb12823b06f0 > If we actually want audit, we should support it as well. Our systemd > package is compiled with -AUDIT for example. > > Since audit is one of those "enabled unless the user intervenes" option > that also does annoying things, I would like to get rid of it in our kernel. It is supported if you count [community] packages. I'll ask on the LKML if anything can be done about the logging.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
