On 16/04/14 14:09, Daniel Micay wrote: > There has been a recent surge of interest in securing Arch by paying > closer attention to CVEs and addressing many security issues in our > packages. I also started some initial work/documenting on securing the > services shipped in various packages: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Service_isolation > > To go along with this, I'm interested in maintaining the grsecurity > kernel and userspace tools in [community] to provide a hardened kernel > and role-based access control system. This would be the first case of an > alternative kernel in the repositories,
It would not be the first case... We specifically got rid of others years ago. > so I'm open to discussion about > whether it's appropriate to do this. There are also some issues relevant > to other packages in the repositories. Which packages? We need the details. Allan
