On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 09:38:12 +0200 Jan de Groot <[email protected]> wrote: > On di, 2014-08-19 at 09:13 +0900, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > > > What the ?!? > > > > You know that's not how this is supposed to work, right? > > > > It's the second time in two days hugin is broken because of people > > updating a dependency without checking for soname bumps and pushing > > straight to [extra]. > > > > Is it really that hard? > > > > GLEW is broken in a special way: it doesn't provide the .so.1 library, > so applications link against .so.1.11 or .so.1.10 instead. This is not > something you would detect when running checkpkg (common sense says to > ignore soname changes which are not in the first digit). > > Anyways, before rebuilding a lot of shit, please check what's wrong > with GLEW, you can do the rebuild all over again when this is fixed.
Too many packages were rebuilt already and fixing glew to provide proper .so.1 library wouldn't change the fact that one symbol has been removed since last release.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
