On 26/12/14 12:01, Daniel Micay wrote: > I'll continue waiting to see what happens with the GCC patches but I'm > not too optimistic about that. The reasoning behind the rejection of the > past bugs / patches was primarily that this should be handled in > autotools (ignoring that most projects don't use it) and that still > applies to this attempt.
This time there was even a comment asking why there was a need for a configuration option and it should bee made default. I think momentum has swung. Allan
