On 22/04/15 07:00, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 21/04/15 23:45, Jerome Leclanche wrote: >> As long as the EDITOR variable is supported by those programs, maybe yes. >> But I don't think creating a symlink *anyway* and make vim provide vi >> is inappropriate. > > Yes, the VISUAL/EDITOR environment variables should still be honored by > these applications. It's only the default fallback editor that is going > to change. > > I'm slightly against adding a vi symlink. That suggestion made sense so > as not to break programs that use vi as their default editor. With nano > as the default editor, there's no technical reason to do this anymore. >
I think the symlink is very important. And I am very against VIsudo calling anything other than vi by default. Unless you rename it nanosudo. A
