On 07.06.2015 15:38, Anatol Pomozov wrote: > The problem with mismatched shared libraries comes from AUR and CPAN > packages. Adding the template to packages in official Arch repo will > not solve this problem at all.
There was also one package that was rebuilt against the wrong repo last year and if I can easily prevent this issue and also help AUR users or those that build from CPAN to detect their own problems I'd rather do that. After all I also created libdeps in makepkg... > Better way to handle the Perl major release ABI change is to provide > users a script that finds all perl libraries not belonging to official > packages and asks user to reinstall that packages. I guess I could add that to my script indeed. Thanks for the idea. > It makes more sense to put /vendor_perl before /site_perl. Packages > installed by pacman should have higher priority than users' package. Nobody will expect that behaviour. I'm not going to change this (if it's even possible). > Even better if installing system packages from CPAN gets discouraged. > Non-pacman system installation brings more troubles than good. Agreed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
