On 2015-12-18 21:15, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On ven., 2015-12-18 at 14:57 -0500, Dave Reisner wrote: >> On Dec 18, 2015 14:43, "Sébastien Luttringer" <se...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> I assume this is a copy paste error... Seems like you're suggesting we use >> resolved by default? > Yes it is, the new hosts line will be: > hosts: files resolve mymachines myhostname > > Yes too, I'm suggesting to use nss-resolve by default, as it switch to nss-dns > for configuration with systemd-resolved disabled. > >>> 2) Merge /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin. This may require user >> intervention >>> if /usr/local/sbin is not empty. So I'll post an announcement about that. >>> I'm running my system since September with merged sbin with no problem. >> >> Why do we care what people do with /usr/local? Nothing we change here makes >> our lives easier and only potentially inflicts pain on users who have split >> between /usr/local/bin and sbin. If we were to change this, I'd suggest we >> just drop /usr/local/sbin from the package. Pacman will drop tracking of >> the dir and there won't be any potential need for user interaction. >> > The idea behind this is to clean our default PATH from the useless difference > between sbin and bin. > > --- profile (revision 256723) > +++ profile (working copy) > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > umask 022 > > # Set our default path > -PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin" > +PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin" > export PATH > > I'm fine with dropping the symlink, it will be easier and no announcement to > write. > I did that to not break the path search in that directory. Maybe using > systemd- > tmpfiles to manage the symlink will offer best of the 2 approach? > > Cheers, > >
/usr/local is not our thing to manage. "Cleaning" default PATH gives you nothing except less characters in some environment variable. BP
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
