On 2016-06-28 20:09, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > Dear all, > > For a while now packages in [testing] have gotten little to no signoffs > and I've been moving mine to [core] after a week without feedback. I > suspect many of you have been doing this too. Here's the signoff reports > over the last ten days: > > - June 19: 0 signoffs > - June 20: 6 from me, 4 from anthraxx > - June 21: 0 > - June 22: 5 from me > - June 23: 2 from demize > - June 24: 1 from me > - June 25: 0 > - June 26: 1 from me > - June 27: 3 from me, 1 from eworm > - June 28: 3 from heftig, 2 from arojas > > So I've decided to shorten the wait in [testing] to 48 hours. Many > updates to [core] packages include security fixes and they have better > move sooner rather than later. We used to be able to gather enough > signoffs to move these within a day or two, and that's what I intend to > do with or without signoffs. > > Any comment, and especially any other idea to fix this situation, is > welcome. > > Cheers. >
I have the same problem with my packages. I usually wait a couple of days (up to week) if there is no security fixes. I guess we can just move to lazy consensus mode and assume if nobody complains, the package is fine and move it after 48-76 hours. Bartłomiej
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
