I favor 3) as well. Seems rather easy to implement and I don't really
think we need to support architecture that old.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Allan McRae <al...@archlinux.org> wrote:
> This goes beyond just adding SSE2 support.
> Years ago, Arch Linux was "optimised for modern processors". These were
> the days when every other distro was using i386 and we had a blazingly
> fast i686 port. Now every other distro uses i686 while we have sat
> still. Even major software developments are starting to require SSE2.
> It is time we moved forward.
> How can we achieve this? I see several options:
> 1) Do "nothing". Add a hook to the filesystem package that detects
> whether a system has SSE2 support and blocks installation of certain
> 2) Add SSE2 to our optimisations and require "i686 + SSE2"
> 3) Move our minimum CPU to something less than 20 years old (even i786
> would get us SSE2+3 instructions and is 15 years old)
> 4) We add more modern CPU builds (and set them automatically building
> once the base architecture is updated).
> I am in favour of #3 for our 32-bit support. And that would be end of
> line as far as 32 bit support in this distribution goes.
> (We may want to consider #4 for our x86_64, but that is another