On 2017-05-16 16:21, [email protected] wrote: > Since moving on to OpenSSL 1.1 and introducing a compatibility package > openssl-1.0 (which isn't compatible), we still have FS#53836 [1] open. > > > > I want to propose another openssl-1.0 rebuild that restores binary > compatibility with non-free software and Debian Jessie (jessie-backports) by > packaging OpenSSL 1.0.2 with 1.0.0 soname and 1.0.0 versioned symbols. > > At this moment I don't care about an openssl-1.0.2 package that ships > libssl.so.1.0.2 like Debian does in unstable/testing at the moment, when > non-free software catches up with that we can introduce such a package > later. > > > > Any objections? If not, let's make a new rebuild list and fix this. >
Absolutely no objections from me, I'm more than happy to rebuild some. Bartłomiej
