On 11.06.2017 01:39, Allan McRae wrote:
> I am very against this part (hook is completely fine).   Having the perl
> executable be something other than upstream (and every other distro)
> provides, is not what Arch is about.

Noted

> I'm assuming the new location would be transparent to packagers (i.e.
> they would not need to alter their PKGBUILDs)?

Yeah, no changes are required outside the main perl package. We just
have to rebuild affected packages and the perl build system will pick up
the new path automatically.

Florian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to