Hey all,

I'd like to move the following packages to community:
zita-at1 [1]
zita-bls1 [2]
zita-dpl1 [3]
zita-lrx [4]
zita-rev1 [5]
zita-njbridge [6]
zita-mu1 [7]
jacktrip [8]
padthv1 [9]

The first seven are de-facto standards, developed by Fons Adriansen
(some other of his zita-* tools are already in extra and community).
They are low maintenance and have a low frequency release cycle.
Jacktrip is one of the few working audio-over-network solutions using
jack servers on both ends [10].
Padthv1 is (yet) another Qt based audio application by Rui Nuno Capela
and part of the vee one suite [11] (the other three parts of the set are
already in community - synthv1, drumkv1, samplv1).

As they have a low voting count, I'm hereby asking:
Are there any objections to them being moved?


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-at1
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-bls1
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-dpl1
[4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-lrx
[5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-rev1
[6] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-njbridge
[7] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/zita-mu1
[8] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jacktrip
[9] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/padthv1
[10] http://jackaudio.org/faq/netjack.html
[11] http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/1879


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to