On 05/29/2018 03:56 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> gcc-cuda will probably introduce a lot of confusion. Let's use
> standard naming practice for the old versioned packages (i.e. gcc7 or
> gcc-7).

Sorry, that was a joke. :D

I think gcc7 is fine, if anyone complains tell them it's really gcc-cuda
in disguise. It's not like we've never provided old things for packages
which need them before, so it's just a cuda thing which is fine to have.

-- 
Eli Schwartz
Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to