On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:56:30AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov via arch-dev-public 
wrote:
> And if we plan to encourage adding the cache warmup to all golang
> PKGBUILD (that's gonna be thousands of packages) then this extra
> complexity need be justified. Anyone who wants to follow our advise
> needs to have clear answers to following questions: Is this feature
> solely to avoid the download during the build() step or there is
> something else? Why downloading in build() is bad, does it hurt the
> users? What use-cases does show an advantage of the cache warmup..
> etc..

There are something like 140 packages using go today in our repositories today,
there is no need for some grand justification. The justification, if anything is
needed, is this RFC alone and the fact we should strive to follow the packaging
guidelines when applicable.

-- 
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to