On 2025-07-01 18:56:05 (+0200), Levente Polyak wrote: > On 7/1/25 6:44 PM, David Runge wrote: > > > ### Merge-request indicator > > > > > > All secondary architecture related merge-requests must be flagged with the > > > new `pkg::ports` GitLab label. It'll help separate them from the usual > > > requests and allow interested packagers and contributors to filter on them > > > globally, to help out others. > > > > Externals usually do not have the right to set a label on a merge request (I > > might be wrong here). > > To clarify: The bug wranglers/package maintainers should add this label, > > right? > > > > I'd probably want to spend a bit of time looking into merge-request template > with some check-boxes, we already have experience rolling it out for a whole > group in the buildbtw sandbox. With a dedicated template we have all the > required markers for bugbuddy to identify such a merge-request and add the > label automatically. > As a fallback, if contributors aren't following the appropriate procedure, > bug wranglers/package maintainers would need to fix the label.
Right, that sounds like a sensible solution and thanks for clarifying! Best, David -- https://sleepmap.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
