On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:40 PM, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have community repo already, hand svn packages to community may work, but
> I still think it could be better to distinguish such packages from anothers.
> Unstable repo is useless if only a few people use it. Drop it if we can't
> make it more useful, that's why I propose for a rename, to try to bring it
> to the right direction.

What Giovanni was proposing is using that already set up repo as a new
community repo, since devs seem to be ok about dropping unstable, and
at the moment community still relies on cvs (see my other mail about
it).

Corrado

Reply via email to