Finkregh wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 00:31:50 +0200
Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw: does anybody know why the previous maintainer has
used /etc/httpd/conf instead of /etc/httpd?
Why is that directory used at all?
Doesn't it make more sense to use something like '/etc/apache/' like
e.g. lighttpd does?
Or is there already a policy on that i overlooked?
Actually, "apache" is not called "apache", but is called httpd. It has been called
httpd ever since 2.0. (The <2.0 series used apache as name, that's why people generally call httpd
apache).
The usage of /etc/httpd (with a conf subdirectory below) is because it allows
you to set the serverroot to /etc/httpd. That's why there is a log and modules
symlink in there. If we didn't do it like that, what whould we set the
serverroot to?
If you've been using httpd for a long time, then the way it's currently set up
makes perfect sense and is the most logical one too (I wouldn't know any better
way to set it up).
Glenn
