On 07.04.2010 16:10, Allan McRae wrote: > This would really not help here. Pacman does not directly link openssl, > but does through libarchive and libfetch. Adding versioned libarchive > and libfetch to pacman's deps and using sodeps on openssl in those > packages would prevent pacman's SyncFirst from working. >
Don't add depends=(libfetch.sp libarchive.so) to the pacman PKGBUILD and
it won't be a problem. (Also see #2 below)
> no versioned deps in pacman for lib{archive,fetch} = bad as between the
> openssl and lib{archive,fetch} updates vercmp is broken and so is
> install files.
sodeps would ensure that pacman updates libfetch and libarchive directly
after openssl.
>
>> Have you already checked the patch Allan?
>
> Yes... but my comments were never addressed:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010446.html
Which patch version did you read back then? The one you replied to has
all but 1 of those changes. (See below)
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010406.html
> (points #1 and #2)
1) I'm only waiting for someone to implement the change in pacman (I'm
not good at C), but the makepkg part is already done.
2) The latest patch does exactly that.
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010421.html
I've removed that already.
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/pacman-dev/2010-February/010426.html
I actually don't worry about it anymore and the current code works so I
see no need to change it.
--
Florian Pritz -- {flo,[email protected]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
