2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee <[email protected]>: > I'd still like to know how this replaces/conflicts with Arch policy for > 'as upstream as possible'. I'm aware that just starting out the answer > may just be "we don't know yet", but for me one of the benefits of Arch > is that all packages are close to upstream (and thus its easy to discuss > bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-patches > from git/svn). >
how 'bout things upstream doesn't take care of like pam.d policies... I seem to recall there being a request for a pam policy for login managers... as a result of my pointing out that even if your shell is false you can login graphically. -- Caleb Cushing http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
