On 03-08-2010 16:14, Simon Stoakley wrote:
On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský<l.jirkov...@gmail.com>:
On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski<t.p...@gmx.de> wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer& Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
I get following error on x86_64:
(1/1) checking for file conflicts
[####################] 100%
error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.devname exists in filesystem
kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.softdep exists in filesystem
but it may be due to the experiments with kernel26-rc I did earlier
today.
I get this too (on x86_64; didn't check on i686), when trying to
upgrade from 2.6.34.1-1. Also, no package owns those two files, but
the rest of the /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.* files are owned by
kernel26 2.6.34.1-1.
I also get this, if it's safe to pacman -Sf this, wouldn't it be a
good idea to put up a news item,(as i think someone suggested earlier)
to stop the forum getting flodded with posts and also to let people
know (it is the kernel after all). Just a thought.
I'd indeed appreciate if a news item was generated with a little more
detailed explanation of how to handle with the error. Because so far I
don't understand from both this and arch-dev-public's thread on the same
matter.
