On 27/07/12 13:57, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: > The 27/07/12, Mike wrote: > >> I'm aware of that, but that doesn't mean one can't fix them. Nobody >> said, that the code base of sysvinit shouldn't be modified. > It would have been fixed for a long time if it were easy enough. :-) > Uhm there are init systems available that are baesd on or using sysvinit or at least are trying to stay compatible (e.g. upstart), without reinventing the wheel or declare the unix philosophy obsolote.
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of rea... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of... Dennis Herbrich
- [arch-general] Re: Systemd : Analysis o... Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analys... Mike
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Nicholas MIller
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Baho Utot
- [arch-general] Re: Systemd : A... Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Mike
- [arch-general] Re: Systemd : A... Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Mike
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Stephen E. Baker
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : An... Mike
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of rea... Baho Utot
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of reactions of Use... Tom Gundersen
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of reactions o... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] Systemd : Analysis of reactio... Tom Gundersen
- [arch-general] [off-list] Systemd : Analysis... Ralf Mardorf
- Re: [arch-general] [off-list] Systemd : ... Ralf Mardorf