On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 11:35:04 -0400 Manolo Martínez <man...@austrohungaro.com> wrote:
> On 08/09/12 at 05:27pm, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Am 09.08.2012 17:12, schrieb Jonathan: > > > In the past I have seen ext2 saves time during boot vs ext3.Having a > > > journal is no use since the files are rarely changed and the > > > filesystem is mostly opened read only. The journal takes up some > > > space. These may matter to you if you are trying to optimize boot > > > times or disk usage. > > > > Then use ext4 without a journal. ext2 is out of date and ext4 is > > superior in every aspect. > > > > > Is it safe to change an existing /boot from ext2 to ext4? https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ext4 > > Manolo > > -- Leonid Isaev GnuPG key: 0x164B5A6D Fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E1BE 775A A7AE F6CB 164B 5A6D
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
