On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:29 PM, Mike Cloaked <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Ionut Biru <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> pacman -Qo /usr/lib/xorg/modules/dri/swrast_dri.so >> pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 >> >> Thank you Ionut. The conflicting files are owned by libgl 9.0.2-1 - but > I am unsure whether this means that libgl needs to be removed before > running the updates? Will mesa-libgl then replace the functionality that > libgl currently provides? I'd like to be sure before doing this so I don't > do something that could cause my system graphics to fail. I did not see any > announcement saying this was going to happen? > > > OK I saw your post in arch-dev-public about removing libgl from extra, and also that re-running the pacman update now also replaces libgl with mesa-libgl - so this is resolved. Thanks -- mike c
