On 23/11/14 04:35 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Hi, > > while for virtualbox Arch Linux does follow upstream, even while there > is a critical known USB issue, for Claws Mail, where AFAIK isn't a > critical issue, it doesn't follow upstream. > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 09:07:22 +0000 > nore...@thewildbeast.co.uk wrote: >> The latest release is v. 3.11.1, what can you observe with that? > > "Stable release 3.11.1 (October 27, 2014; 23 days ago)" - > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claws_Mail > > "Latest Release: 3.11.1 (News), on 27 October 2014" - > http://www.claws-mail.org/news.php > > $ pacman -Si claws-mail | grep Ver > Version : 3.11.0-2 > > ;) > > I try to understand this, but I can't understand it. Is there latitude > for the maintainers to decide what is an official release from upstream > and what isn't? > > Regards, > Ralf > > PS: > The Claws package isn't a problem for me. > $ pacman -Q claws-mail-git > claws-mail-git 3.11.1.r26.g00cade7-1 > But the virtualbox package is really an annoyance.
Packages are updated when the maintainers have time to do it. This crappy trolling isn't helping your case.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
