Sat, 23 May 2015 13:39:00 +0200 Alad Wenter <a...@archlinux.info>: > arch-general-requ...@archlinux.org schreef op 2015-05-19 14:00: > > > Anyone have a system they haven't upgraded in ~24hrs to give it a > > further test, see if logins are broken after the pam upgrade? > > > > -te > > I've had similar issues, except it broke systemctl --user > functionality. systemctl daemon-reexec didn't work. For now I've > downgraded to Pam 1.1.9. > > Can you try rebuilding systemd with ABS (perhaps it only needs to be > linked against the new PAM version) > > Alad
This isn't about downgrading or rebuilding, but rather about sub-par information. If you're upgrading a bunch of packages (your usual -Syu) with 'pam' being one of many and it's not echoing any hint or warning about a soname change, well, duh. PAM is such an essential library that I wouldn't bother with identifying which services and programs need to be reloaded, but rather simply reboot. I overlooked it too, until I discovered I couldn't unlock xscreensaver. --byte
pgphNs426KrAf.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
