Hey, > If Arch is forced to comply, the MidnightBSD path looks great to me.
As I explained in my former email, banning a group of people from a open source project makes the project nonfree (aka not open source!). MidnightBSD is no longer open source software, nor is it free software, as they have removed the licence grant to Californians excluding them. Both free software and open source software require EVERYONE to have the same licence grant, without excluding any groups of people. Please do not endorse making Arch Linux nonfree, thanks! Take care, -- Polarian Jabber/XMPP: [email protected]
