On 10/23/26 17:10, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 2026-10-23 at 16:22 -0400, Pocket wrote:
I have run into that as well updpkgsums will correct that.
In that case, the checksum serves no purpose, and you can just use
'SKIP' in the first place.
Yes that is very true.
I choose to fix it using updpkgsums,then when it changes again I am
alerted to the fact it has changed and can investigate. If I choose to
use SKIP it will never be alerted to fact that it has changed once again
and so i don't get a "warning" to investigate.
--
Hindi madali ang maging ako
