On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:59, Peter Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Magnus, > > > This is a minor point, but is the new version of archlinux (0.3.5) really > > API compatible with the previous version (0.3.4)? > > yes, I believe it is. I certainly tried to make all changes in a backwards > compatible manner. > > > If the answer is 'no', then the newer version ought to be 0.4 (or 0.4.0). > > [...] I would also argue that cabal2arch is bumped to 0.8 (or 0.8.0) to > > clearly mark that the UI has changed and isn't compatible with the previous > > version (0.7.5). > > Yes, I think a major version bump is in order simply because there have been > plenty of changes to both archlinux and cabal2arch. How about bumping the > version number for both packages to 1.0? They appear to be well out of beta > state, so it feels like we should have an 1.x release.
Yes, I'd say go for it :-) Remy, as the other main contributor nowadays (besides Peter), do you have any objections? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
