On 08/11/10 19:51, Xyne wrote: > Magnus Therning wrote: > >>> I suggest adding them to a group named "haskell-platform" too. >> >> With or without having a haskell-platform package? > > Packages and groups should never have the same name. If you think a package > by that name would make more sense then forget I mentioned using a group.
I personally think a (meta-) package is better than a group. I've never really understood groups. That is, I understand perfectly how they work, but I don't understand the reason for having them. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
