On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 13:38, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:44, Peter Simons <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi Xyne, >> >> > Why does haskell-parallel in [extra] depends on a later version of >> > haskell-deepseq than what is availabe in [extra]? The package simply >> > cannot be installed because of this. >> >> on top of this, [extra] ships parallel-3.1.0.1, which is way ahead of >> the version haskell-platform requires, namely parallel-2.2.0.1. >> >> There are other problems in [extra] (such as FS#21615 and FS#21613), all >> of which have been reported a while ago, but still there seems to be no >> discernible progress towards remedying the situation. This is really >> frustrating. I thought Remy volunteered to help maintaining [extra] >> precisely to avoid these kind of problems. So what is going on? What is >> the point of me bothering to maintain AUR, if our base packages in >> [extra] are outright broken for extended periods of time? > > Peter, the work you put into AUR is very much appreciated. It's > unfortunate that [extra] was allowed to enter the state of brokenness > it currently is in, but that doesn't in any way detract from the value > of your work. > > Based on a very small sample, it seems some of the packages in [extra] > were updated about 11 days ago. Some of these have since been > reverted back to the HP versions again. Is there some easy way to > quickly go through the packages in [extra] to identify which ones > still aren't on the HP version?
Answering my own question on this. Only haskell-parallel seems to still be on a non-HP version. /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
