On 07/01/11 18:47, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi guys, [...] > In my humble opinion, we have to figure out how to improve our team work > if we want to succeed at providing a comprehensive set of Haskell > packages for ArchLinux.
This sort of feedback is invaluable in my opinion. Our previous discussions on what we wanted to do, and how we could achieve it didn't really benefit from a lot of experience with the tools and maintaining a larger set of packages. Now Peter has built up a large amount of experience! Peter, do you think that our earlier discussion was on target, i.e. did we correctly identify the real pain points, and does our suggestions on improving our tools still make sense? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
