On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 09:17:29PM +0100, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: > On 2011/2/10 Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 00:42, Rémy Oudompheng <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> I don't really want to have these packages in [testing] or > >> [extra] before darcs and cabal-install have official compatible > >> releases : cherry-picking patches was not exactly > >> straightforward. > > > > Are those the only things you are waiting for still, darcs and > > cabal-install? > > > > Yes, only those. I think we can keep current darcs binary, since > it's statically linked, but I'm not really sure about cabal-install. > What is your opinion on that ?
Since cabal-install is part of HP I expect that the version specified in HP 2011.2.0.0 *will* compile with the version of GHC specified :-) It looks like what we have now is good, but let's keep it in [staging] for now. Hopefully the final version of HP won't require huge changes. I think that moving GHC7 + other packages to [extra] can happen as soon as HP 2011.2.0.0 is released. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
pgpnuyE480qqO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
