On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:12, Nicolas Pouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:38:59PM -0800, Leif Warner wrote: >>> I'm hoping the version of text in [extra] can be upgraded - I just >>> left a comment on xmobar-git [1] that it's been marked outdated >>> since last month, and is behind Haskell Platform. It's blocking >>> upgrade there, too. >>> >>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44683 >> >> Slightly off-topic, the version of text in the latest haskell-platform >> still isn't the latest (0.11.1.5 vs. 0.11.1.12) so this situation is >> bound to come about again in the near future. > > Indeed but I support the concept of the haskell-platform. It is too > restrictive to only packages able to track the latest versions of > their dependencies. > > I suggest we try this technique on one case first and the text package > seems to be a good example. We could package the latest version of > text and upgrade some package which depend on it.
I'm sorry, but what "technique" are you referring to here? /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
