On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 07:44:42PM -0500, t...@hiddenrock.com wrote: > > AFAIK we don't do anything special when generating the documentation so this > > feels like an upstream bug. > > I thought so, too, but I couldn't figure out what the upstream intent was > because, as you say, we just use what they give us here. I thought somebody > around here might have an idea, rather than me just pushing it upstream > directly. > > > Maybe we should drop the use of the upstream script and use something > > simpler instead. This seems to work well enough: > > Works for me! Thanks.
Good. Note that the ghc package is excluded (which it is in the upstream setup as well). /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: mag...@therning.org jabber: mag...@therning.org twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves. -- Alan Kay
pgpoQtrr3XeVN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
