On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 08:13:56AM -0600, stef204 wrote:
> 16.10.2015, 05:38, "Magnus Therning" <mag...@therning.org>:
> > I usually operate on *all added packages* at once through the whole
> > upgrade/add process.
> >
> 
> Here above ^^ I am not completely sure what you mean....
> Are you referring to using just one single pacman -S command with all
> of the packages needing installation at once?

Nope, I'm talking about `cblrepo add`.

> > I'm currently experimenting with a split package for stack though.
> 
> This should be interesting.

I'm not so sure ;)  It's been brought up before that it'd be nice to
have a separate package for the pandoc binary.  Splitting does need
quite a bit of knowledge of the package though, but my initial fear of
maintaining a pkgbuild patch longterm was rather exaggerated I think.

> > Also, if you want to clean out your system you can use `pacman
> > -Rncs ghc` to do it (you'll be left with exe-only packages, like
> >  cblrepo, though).
> >
> 
> OK, thanks for that info, I guess it all depends on ghc so removing it
> would remove all haskell packages except binaries..

Exactly!

/M

-- 
Magnus Therning                      OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 
email: mag...@therning.org   jabber: mag...@therning.org
twitter: magthe               http://therning.org/magnus

As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
     -- Albert Einstein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
arch-haskell mailing list
arch-haskell@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell

Reply via email to