Pierre Schmitz ([email protected]) wrote on 18 November 2010 13:12: >On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:00:01 -0200, Carlos Carvalho ><[email protected]> wrote: >> It's not a problem, it's because we exclude the very old releases. I >> know about these messages but since the repository is correct I hadn't >> bothered about them. To avoid confusion with other mirrors I've just >> excluded the symlinks as well. > >I see. I now solved that on our side and moved all isos older than 2009 >to our archives which are not synced by default. So there is no need to >exclude some files on your side anymore.
Good! I was just going to exclude the 2009 ones as well :-) >Just let us know of such problems. Those old isos are of no use for >most people anyway. Sure. I didn't say anything because I thought it was your policy to keep them. _______________________________________________ arch-mirrors mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-mirrors
