On 07/05/2013 02:26 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 07/05/2013 06:17 PM, Carl Thompson wrote:
On 07/05/2013 10:11 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am 05.07.2013 17:04, schrieb Carl Thompson:
Hello,
I would like to setup 4 new mirrors now and 2 more in the very new
future (within 2 months).
There will be 3 in the US, 1 in London, 1 in Hong Kong, and 1 in Sydney.
Sounds great! How is you plan to sync those? Would you sync one of your
server from one of our tier 1 mirrors and then sync the others from
there?
Currently we sync from the closest tier 1 for other repos. We are
working to re architect the sync procedures using jenkins instead of
cron so that we can tier things such as sync 1 of our mirrors then
invoke syncs from our other mirrors.
if you are requesting to became tier 1, should you sync directly from us?
The wiki article just states to sync from a tier 1 mirror.
If you have preferred mirrors I sync from for dallas, chicago, sydney,
and hong kong I'd be more than happy to adjust the temporary syncing.
When I get my task manager setup I will sync to one of my locations and
push the changes out to the rest of my mirrors that way.
Carl Thompson
Rackspace
However your wiki states you are not accepting new ftp mirrors. All
of our mirrors are configured for http, ftp, and rsync.
Will our servers being configured for ftp exclude us from the
possibility of being an official mirror?
That's not a problem as you also provide http. We just no longer
advertise the use of ftp as it has all kinds of disadvantages. This
would then only exclude mirrors that only offer ftp. So you should be
fine.
Good to know.
Carl Thompson
Rackspace
Greetings,
Pierre
_______________________________________________
arch-mirrors mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-mirrors
_______________________________________________
arch-mirrors mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-mirrors
