On 01.02.2016 20:22, Luchesar V. ILIEV wrote: > Blame it on my FreeBSD past (and part present), but I actually prefer > the short generic name to be used for discussions (i.e. arch-mirrors@), > while the announcements-only list to be named accordingly (e.g. > arch-mirrors-announce@). This would perhaps also be more in line with > the general AL announcements list, arch-announce@.
Good point. I'll do that. > Admittedly, three separate lists for an already quite a low traffic one > is an overkill, but on the other hand there would be a good separation > between the different types of messages with their different urgency. We don't care about the list count so I'll probably go with this. We really have 3 pretty distinct types of traffic here so we should just separate them properly. I did see Daniel's reply about only having one list, but I feel that we should have a list for discussion. We also definitively need a list for Arch Linux staff to reach all mirror admins so 3 lists seems like the best way to go. > _______________________________________________ > arch-mirrors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-mirrors I'll also get rid of this footer because it is really annoying and none of our other lists have it. It also breaks DKIM signatures and I also think about dropping the subject prefix for this reason. That discussion will happen at a later date though. Florian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch-mirrors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-mirrors
