On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:34:26PM +0200, Erich Eckner wrote: > Hi, > > ok, so I think, the i686-only version is the way to go. I uploaded a > first test to mirror.archlinux32.org/archisos/ > > If you find any bugs, just let me know (frankly, I didn't test these > isos, because I dont have time right now).
Hi, I tried archlinux-2017.03.28-i686.iso and I get: " ISOLINUX 6.03 6.03* ETCD Copyright (C) 1995-2014 H. Peter Anvin et al No DEFAULT or UI onfiguration directive found! boot: " I tried to boot in libvirt on an Archlinux machine and a real machine with Intel Pentium III, ASUS P2B-S. I'm trying to find out what the problem might be.. any hints are welcome. :-) BTW: I can contribute to the project by testing: I have the following hardware I plan to keep for a while: ASUS EEEPC 701 QNAP TS-439 PRO HP ProLiant DL140 G1 Desktop ASUS P2B-S Intel Pentium III Cheers Andreas -- Andreas Baumann Trottenstrasse 20 CH-8037 Zuerich Telefon: +41(0)76/373 01 29 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.andreasbaumann.cc > > Because, I personally like to have one rescue thumb drive for both i686 > and x86_64, I try to keep the dual-bootable iso up to date, too. But if > it needs to much time, I might drop that. > > Cheers, > Erich > > On 25.03.2017 15:24, Tomislav Butkovic wrote: > > There are people who havent purchased x86_64 systems yet, so i686 only iso > > that fits on cd is appealing. If we wanted x86_64 iso we could just go to > > archlinux.org, right? > > > > Ive been running arch on an acer O751h since 2013. The wiki documentation > > has always been a crucial part to learning the distro. I hope that > > continues w the port. > > > > Tom > > > > Le samedi 25 mars 2017, Alex Theotokatos <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> On 03/25/2017 12:36 PM, Erich Eckner wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi i686-fans, > >>> > >>> to not loose any potential new i686-users, I moved on by forking archiso > >>> and generating a current dual-bootable iso. Currently it resides at > >>> https://eckner.net/archlinux-2017.03.25-dual.iso, but maybe somewhen in > >>> the future we can move it to some more official place ;-) > >>> The source of archiso32 resides at github: > > github.com/archlinux32/archiso32. > >>> > >>> I stumbled upon one question: > >>> Is it desirable to have the iso dual bootable (i686 and x86_64) or do we > >>> want a solely i686-iso? > >>> The benefit of a i686-only-iso would be, that it'd fit on a cd. The > >>> benefit of a dual-bootable one would be, that we could use archiso32 as > >>> it is right now and that you can boot any machine (32 or 64 bits) with > >>> this - obviously. > >>> Any comments are appreciated. > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> Erich > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> arch-ports mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports > >> > >> I think it is better to add the link at http://archlinux32.org/ > >> And I'll prefer the dual architecture but many old computers doesn't boot > > from usb and burning dvd for ~800mb sounds like wasting a dvd disk. > >> Maybe a dual netboot might me an option. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> arch-ports mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > arch-ports mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports > > > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports -- Andreas Baumann Trottenstrasse 20 CH-8037 Zuerich Telefon: +41(0)76/373 01 29 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.andreasbaumann.cc _______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports
