On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:47:06 +0800, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: >> This was discussed in a bug report iirc, here is some summary: >> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Linux-distributions-to-include-run-directory-1219006.html >> >> Apparently, many tools (among them udev) will soon require a /run/ >> directory that is mounted early (as tmpfs). It is probably a good idea >> to add this to the filesystem and initscripts packages. > > I have prepared patches > (https://github.com/teg/initscripts-arch/commits/bootlogd) that mounts > /run if it is not already mounted in initscripts. > > I'll push them out if /run is added to filesystem (my requires /run to > exist, but an existing /run without write permissions will not cause > any problems, so it would be best to add this to filesystem first and > then for initscripts to follow). > > Do the filesystem maintainer(s?) agree to add this? > > Cheers, > > Tom
I'll add the /run dir to the next filesystem package. I guess once this is done we could start updating our packages to use /run instead of /var/run, right? -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
