On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: >> Isn't the logic here inverted: 1=false and 0=true? Maybe just the name >> needs to change? > > Looks fine to me. bash evaluates a command as "true" when it returns a 0 > (no-error) status.
I stand corrected. But, but, but that is insane of bash... > Certainly, updating the wiki would be in order. That said, we need to > assume that our users are following the upgrade paths we set forth and > properly merging their pacnews. It doesn't matter I guess. If there are no other objections/comments (and if it doesn't break my boot ;-) ). I'll push it out sometime next week (I'll pull from your github). Thanks for your work on this! Cheers, Tom
