On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:58:03PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 08:44:12PM +0200, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 04:38:28PM -0500, Dan McGee wrote: > > > > We don't need to invoke svn copy on each file; it accepts multiple > > > > arguments. This cut Allan's time releasing one patch-friendly package > > > > from 5 minutes to 2 minutes. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > archrelease | 5 ++--- > > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/archrelease b/archrelease > > > > index 2f6a563..7bb4c8a 100755 > > > > --- a/archrelease > > > > +++ b/archrelease > > > > @@ -52,9 +52,8 @@ for tag in "$@"; do > > > > svn add --parents -q "repos/$tag" > > > > fi > > > > > > > > - for file in "${known_files[@]}"; do > > > > - svn copy -q -r HEAD "$trunk/$file" "repos/$tag/" > > > > - done > > > > + # copy all files at once from trunk to the subdirectory in > > > > repos/ > > > > + svn copy -q -r HEAD ${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/} "repos/$tag/" > > > > > > +1 from me. I wondered why we were looping over the single files in the > > > first place. However, if we copy from current HEAD anyway, I don't see > > > any reason to not just use `svn copy -q -r HEAD "$trunk/" "repos/$tag/"` > > > here. > > > > > > > +1 from me provided we quote the array expansion. > > > > $ known_files=(foo "bar baz") trunk=/some/path > > > > $ printf '%s\n' ${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/} > > /some/path/foo > > /some/path/bar > > baz > > > > $ printf '%s\n' "${known_files[@]/#/$trunk/}" > > /some/path/foo > > /some/path/bar baz > > Well, how is this superior to just copying the whole trunk directory?
No idea. Will svn copy pick up files that aren't tracked? (packages, src/, pkg/, signatures...) d
