On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any decision on how should be configured mkinitcpio-busybox (I am > talk about "init" built-in)? I am still patching rc.shutdown for current > mkinitcpio-busybox without init built-in to work.
I believe Thomas agreed to add init, but I suppose that only makes sense once he merges the rest of the shutdown ramfs stuff into mkinitcpio. -t
