Am 05.11.2011 10:05, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > My issue is with allowing passwords to be written "inline", as well as the > fact that we intepret the file as bash rather than plaintext.
When automatically opening volumes, you are not supposed to use passphrases, but keyfiles. > If we skip those > possibilities and move closer to the Debian format from which (I assume) we > started, things should be simpler. I have no idea what that format is, but there is a shitload of possibilities for crypto, and a "one line per volume" format doesn't seem to cover them all. > I also heard that Gnome should soon get support for dealing with the Debian- > style crypttab format from a GUI, which we might want to take advantage of > (not that I use Gnome, but it sounded neat). I'd rather have a working format than support for a broken one in a GUI. Why would you need GUI support for crypttab anyway? I don't see the benefit.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
