On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jouke Witteveen <[email protected]> wrote: > Are these results structural? You should probably compare > netctl@static to netcfg@static, but other than that I would expect not > much of a difference. The control flow is very similar, with a > preference for netctl, as (I think) it will do less function calls. > Also, keep in mind that due to parallelization, these timings are not > extremely important. The difference is strange, though. It might be > openresolv that takes a bit longer than writing to resolv.conf > directly, but 700ms seems a bit much. > >> % cat /etc/network.d/static >> Connection=ethernet >> Interface=eth0 >> BindToInterfaces=(eth0) > > This line is not needed, as $BindToInterfaces defaults to $Interface.
OK! I'm not sure what you mean by 'structural' but after a reboot, it seems that the times are much closer to each other now: % systemd-analyze blame 3479ms [email protected] Also, thanks for the suggestion about the profile. I too like the interface you have designed and hope others agree. Keep up the excellent start you've made with netctl!
