On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Daniel Wallace <[email protected]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > "Jason St. John" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>From: "Jason St. John" <[email protected]> >> >>pacman 4.1 greatly simplied the use of VCS PKGBUILDs. Usage of VCS >>PKGBUILDs is documented in PKGBUILD(5) and on the ArchWiki. Including a >>separate prototype for each VCS is unnecessary, and they should be >>removed. >> >>Signed-off-by: Jason St. John <[email protected]> >>--- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto | 64 >>--------------------------------------- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto | 65 >>---------------------------------------- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto | 66 >>----------------------------------------- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto | 64 >>--------------------------------------- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto | 65 >>---------------------------------------- >>prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto | 63 >>--------------------------------------- >> 6 files changed, 387 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-bzr.proto >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-cvs.proto >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-darcs.proto >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-git.proto >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-hg.proto >> delete mode 100644 prototypes/PKGBUILD-svn.proto >> > > If I remember correctly, cvs and darcs are not supported in pacman yet. I > know at least darcs isn't. So they shouldn't be removed. > - -- > Sent from my Android Phone. > Daniel Wallace > Arch Linux Trusted User > GTManfred > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: APG v1.0.8 > > iQFUBAEBCAA+BQJRYhqXNxxEYW5pZWwgV2FsbGFjZSAoZ3RtYW5mcmVkKSA8ZGFu > aWVsLndhbGxhY2VAZ2F0ZWNoLmVkdT4ACgkQX6XlVE8BDUgPZggAnHcAnrN6vrQf > dlSMpZBZeoR7B2yGtsQkermLuBrBXknsHFc8eKd/yoJ6T7DSOnaMZ0nWT2ddFPeo > XOVU3b3ElyQUb7cx97MkTOkp/Lj9hjTU6oKYPwn/m+/KDTmosR+IXlC61Bri6dYW > lUD9A4lAGtUL/nC1u9MqCcpHpKqIm0SF/laoXAZH7o1Iwlr2ibzZbNwOYTdr5UN+ > 74pN2/eZ9e4Sink1x4Z4bxnxL4SREimkOnf3P7DZ4fz8+HeLClz/XWR1OoFZ2kln > d+7w359QITzyws3Nxs6O1eabdB8LLhFW7ZLTAMKueBjGP2PQ//te968A0idT4mSz > BgiOSm/xpQ== > =npC0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Yes, you are correct. I just checked PKGBUILD(5). I have resubmitted this patch here: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2013-April/003723.html Thanks for catching this! Jason
