On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 25.07.2013 00:24, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: >> commit 7d081a227528201ed65b8bab9ec07ccd8dfc1162 >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue Jul 23 22:10:17 2013 +0200 >> >> Fix references related to netctl-auto(1) >> >> commit 5b0c7cae3e82c96058605941273e33632ec95094 >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue Jul 23 21:44:40 2013 +0200 >> >> Rework some lines in netctl-auto >> >> commit 6bd3fb709988d931e92ddaa5c493be6906a07890 >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Tue Jul 23 11:53:01 2013 +0200 >> >> More consistent quoting in netctl-auto >> >> commit 01f9b7ba788698be0a32534b6e1342b6d58df965 >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun Jul 21 17:12:58 2013 +0200 >> >> Add man page for netctl-auto(1) >> >> commit 8f6e396f8ee47d52faac67922d0ddf6fdfbabecd >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun Jul 21 17:05:03 2013 +0200 >> >> Rewrite of netctl-auto >> >> This adds a command line interface to the netctl-auto script to >> allow users more control over the automatic profile selection. >> >> commit e75d8b1791009712ceda58762489f8a7df9c8140 >> Author: Sebastian Wicki <[email protected]> >> Date: Sun Jul 21 17:01:09 2013 +0200 >> >> Add wpa_unquote function >> >> This function can be used to unquote WPA supplicant config file strings >> returned from wpa_cli calls. > > None of these patches have been sent to this list for review, and I > would have liked the possibility to review them. I strongly object > against submitting and reviewing patches behind closed doors. > >
Thats a valid point, I will try to put them up for review from now on. Related to this concern, there is something I want to ask/discuss. There are relatively few people working on netctl (judging on forum messages, systemd/netctl concepts are far from commonplace, yet). Before netctl was accepted as an Arch project, it was developed in GitHub. I intended to remove the GitHub repository when netctl 1.0 was released. However, people seem much more enthusiastic about contributing on GitHub than about sending patches to this list. Therefore I decided not to take down the GitHub repo for the time being.[1] What is the best way to deal with this? 1: Remove the GitHub mirror anyway. 2: Announce GitHub pull requests on this list 3: Publish GitHub pull requests as patches for review on this list. Regards, - Jouke [1] Additionally, netctl is completely distribution agnostic. Although this is in no way a contradiction with hosting netctl as an Arch Project (something I value very much), it is sometimes claimed that netctl is Arch-only.
